ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Comparison of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombi: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Echocardiographic Factors Associated With Left Ventricular Thrombus Recurrence.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- "DOACs for Left Ventricular Thrombus: Persistent Equipoise Despite New Observational and Randomized Data": comment.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Response to: "DOACs for Left Ventricular Thrombus: Persistent Equipoise Despite New Observational and Randomized Data".Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious thromboembolic complication in patients with cardiomyopathies. Evidence supporting direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy in LVT is limited. Objectives: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with LVT. Methods: A multisite retrospective cohort study was performed, including patients with LVT diagnosed by echocardiography from 2018-2023 who were treated with either DOACs or VKAs. Primary outcome was the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE). Secondary outcomes included LVT resolution, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 182 patients with LVT met inclusion criteria, of which 70 (38.5%) were treated with only DOACs and 112 (61.5%) with only VKAs. The mean age was 66 years, and 74% of the patients were male. The median follow-up duration was 363.5 days (IQR, 139-950). No significant difference between the groups was observed in the incidence of SSE (DOAC, 5.7% vs VKA, 5.4%; Conclusion: LVT treated solely with either DOACs or VKAs had similar incidences of SSE, LVT resolution, time to LVT resolution, and mortality. VKA therapy, however, was associated with a higher incidence of major bleeding events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.