ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Risk Factors for Lyme Disease in the General Population-A Survey of Adults and Caregivers in 28 States.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are an estimated 476 000 diagnosed and treated cases of Lyme disease (LD) in the United States each year. The risk of infection depends on human contact with ticks infected with Methods: We conducted online surveys of adults (ages 18+) and caregivers of children aged 1-17 in jurisdictions with a high incidence of LD, the states neighboring them, and selected counties in California and Oregon (CA/OR). The survey included questions on outdoor activities and occupation in forests, wooded areas, and areas with tall grass, residential characteristics, time spent in a yard, use of personal protection measures, history of LD and tick bites, and LD knowledge and risk perception. Data were weighted separately for each state-level sample and analyzed by region (ie, high incidence, neighboring, and CA/OR) and population (ie, adults and caregivers). Results: A total of 44 330 adults and 28 380 caregivers completed the survey. Most respondents were aware of LD (range, 88-93%), spent time in a yard (adults, 88-92%; children, 96%-98%), or spent recreational time outside (adults, 70-79%; children, 83-84%). Always using prevention measures while doing outdoor recreational activities was reported for 34-40% of adults and 40-42% of children. Conclusions: Despite the high population prevalence of LD awareness and of doing outdoor activities, less than half of surveyed respondents routinely used personal prevention measures to mitigate their risk of tick-borne diseases. More effective strategies and education are needed to prevent LD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.