ArticleCirculation reports2025
Preventive Effect of Nifekalant on Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation and Electrical Storm - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several antiarrhythmic agents, including amiodarone (AMD) and nifekalant (NIF), are used in the management of life-threatening arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although a few studies have compared the antiarrhythmic effect of NIF and AMD, most have focused on termination or defibrillation of VF/VT. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the current evidence on the preventive effects of NIF and AMD on recurrent VF and electrical storm (ES). Methods and Results: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024578486). PubMed (MEDLINE and PMC), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index Expanded, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating patients with cardiac arrest due to recurrent VF and ES treated with AMD or NIF, published before 28 August 2024. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of VF/VT. Secondary outcomes included short-term death and incidence of torsades de pointes (TdP). 5 eligible studies comprising 222 participants were included. Evidence regarding differences between NIF and AMD in the recurrence of VF/VT, short-term death, and incidence of TdP was of very low certainty and remains highly uncertain. Conclusions: NIF and AMD may have little to no difference in preventing the recurrence of VF/VT, short-term death, or incidence of TdP; however, the certainty of the evidence is very low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.