Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216411›Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2025

Preventive Effect of Nifekalant on Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation and Electrical Storm - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kazuo Sakamoto, Kenichi Iijima, Tetsuma Kawaji, Takayuki Kitai, Yukio Hosaka, Mutsuko Sangawa, Hiroki Shiomi, Masashi Yokose, Eiji Hiraoka, Hiroshi Takahashi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kazuo SakamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Kenichi IijimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Tetsuma KawajiDepartment of Cardiology, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Takayuki KitaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic Sapporo Japan.
Yukio HosakaDepartment of Cardiology, Niigata City General Hospital Niigata Japan.
Mutsuko SangawaDepartment of Cardiology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital Kagawa Japan.
Hiroki ShiomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Masashi YokoseDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Eiji HiraokaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center Chiba Japan.
Hiroshi TakahashiDepartment of Cardiology, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital Hokkaido Japan.
Tetsuya MatobaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Migaku KikuchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency and Critical Care Center, Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Yoshio TaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi NonogiPharmaceutical Science, University of Shizuoka Shizuoka Japan.
Teruo NoguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.
Yasushi TsujimotoSystematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG) Osaka Japan.
Toshikazu FunazakiKawaguchi Cupola Rehabilitation Hospital Saitama Japan.
Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC) Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Arrhythmia Task Force and the Guideline Editorial Committee on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Emergency and Critical Care Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several antiarrhythmic agents, including amiodarone (AMD) and nifekalant (NIF), are used in the management of life-threatening arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although a few studies have compared the antiarrhythmic effect of NIF and AMD, most have focused on termination or defibrillation of VF/VT. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the current evidence on the preventive effects of NIF and AMD on recurrent VF and electrical storm (ES). Methods and Results: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024578486). PubMed (MEDLINE and PMC), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index Expanded, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating patients with cardiac arrest due to recurrent VF and ES treated with AMD or NIF, published before 28 August 2024. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of VF/VT. Secondary outcomes included short-term death and incidence of torsades de pointes (TdP). 5 eligible studies comprising 222 participants were included. Evidence regarding differences between NIF and AMD in the recurrence of VF/VT, short-term death, and incidence of TdP was of very low certainty and remains highly uncertain. Conclusions: NIF and AMD may have little to no difference in preventing the recurrence of VF/VT, short-term death, or incidence of TdP; however, the certainty of the evidence is very low.

Indexed as

AmiodaroneElectrical stormNifekalantVentricular fibrillationVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID41216411
PMCPMC12597251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.