ArticleCirculation reports2025
Concern About Falling Is a Predictor of Fall Risk in Older Patients With Cardiovascular Disease - A 1-Year Longitudinal Study.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify fall risk indicators associated with future falls among older patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), based on a multidimensional assessment. Methods and Results: In this prospective cohort study, 129 patients aged ≥65 years with CVD were enrolled between 2021 and 2023. Participants were classified into fall and non-fall groups based on fall incidence during a 1-year follow up. We assessed physical frailty, systolic blood pressure, polypharmacy, and the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) to evaluate concern about falling. The overall 1-year fall incidence was 17.0% (22 falls), equating to 0.28 falls per person-year. Compared with the non-fall group, the fall group was older, had lower physical function and blood pressure, and higher FES-I scores. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted with propensity scores, revealed that a FES-I score ≥28 was a significant predictor of falls (odds ratio [OR] 8.906, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.556-13.031, P=0.001; adjusted OR 2.964, 95% CI 1.038-8.460, P=0.042). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a FES-I cut-off of 28, with an area under the curve of 0.684 (95% CI 0.527-0.840, P=0.017). Conclusions: The 1-year fall incidence among older patients with CVD was comparable with rates in community-dwelling older adults. Higher concern about falling, as measured using FES-I, was significantly associated with future falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.