Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216404›Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2025

Initial Dose of Intravenous Atropine for Patients With Symptomatic Bradycardia - A Scoping Review.

Masashi Yokose, Mutsuko Sangawa, Hiroki Shiomi, Kazuo Sakamoto, Kenichi Iijima, Tetsuma Kawaji, Takayuki Kitai, Yukio Hosaka, Eiji Hiraoka, Teruo Noguchi and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Masashi YokoseDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Mutsuko SangawaDepartment of Cardiology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital Kagawa Japan.
Hiroki ShiomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Kazuo SakamotoDepartment of Cardiology/Coronary Care Unit, Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Kenichi IijimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Tetsuma KawajiDepartment of Cardiology, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Takayuki KitaiDepartment of Cardiology, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic Sapporo Japan.
Yukio HosakaDepartment of Cardiology, Niigata City General Hospital Niigata Japan.
Eiji HiraokaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center Chiba Japan.
Teruo NoguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi TakahashiDepartment of Cardiology and Emergency, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital Hokkaido Japan.
Tetsuya MatobaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Fukuoka Japan.
Migaku KikuchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency and Critical Care Center, Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Yoshio TaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi NonogiPharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka Shizuoka Japan.
Toshikazu FunazakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kawaguchi Cupola Rehabilitation Hospital Saitama Japan.
Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC) Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Arrhythmia Task Force and the Guideline Editorial Committee on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Emergency and Critical Care Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous atropine is widely recommended as the first-line treatment for symptomatic bradycardia, but because the optimal initial dose remains uncertain, the aim of this scoping review was to examine the existing literature on the efficacy and safety of intravenous atropine at specific doses in adult patients with symptomatic bradycardia and to identify gaps in evidence. A systematic search of 4 databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ichushi-Web) was conducted from inception to December 16, 2024. Studies were included if they reported administration of a specified dose of atropine in adult patients, regardless of study design. No randomized controlled trials directly comparing 0.5 mg vs. 1.0 mg were found. A total of 19 studies were included and categorized into groups based on initial atropine dose: low (<0.5 mg), moderate (0.5 mg ≤ dose <1.0 mg), high (≥1.0 mg), and those spanning multiple categories. No consistent relationship was found between atropine dose and clinical outcomes, such as heart rate response or adverse effects. None of the moderate-dose studies reported worsening bradycardia. Moderate-dose atropine could be safe, and the current practice of using 0.5 mg as an initial dose in Japan, where 0.5 mg/mL prefilled syringes are commercially available, appears clinically reasonable. However, in the absence of high-quality comparative data, future research should apply rigorous study designs to determine the optimal atropine dose in emergency care settings.

Indexed as

Intravenous atropineSymptomatic bradycardia

Identifiers

PMID41216404
PMCPMC12597395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.