ArticleCirculation reports2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Initial Point-of-Care Troponin Tests for Patients With Chest Pain Who Were Suspected of Acute Myocardial Infarction - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Self-Transport Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Analysis.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about myocardial infarction on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Point-of-care (POC) cardiac troponin testing, although less sensitive than high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, allows for rapid bedside evaluation. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of POC troponin tests for both ruling in and ruling out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at the time of patient presentation. Methods and Results: In accordance with PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 17, 2023. We included all studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of POC troponin assays for identifying AMI among adult patients. Among the 551 studies initially screened, 6 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy based on these 6 observational datasets demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 47% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-49%) and 90% (95% CI 89-90%), respectively, for AMI detection. In a subgroup meta-analysis of non-ST-segment elevation MI using 4 observational datasets, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 48% (95% CI 45-50%) and 89% (95% CI 89-90%), respectively. Conclusions: These findings emphasize that the clinical application of POC troponin assays in AMI diagnosis must consider the test's robust specificity (≈90%) alongside its limited sensitivity (<50%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.