Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216395›Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2025

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Initial Point-of-Care Troponin Tests for Patients With Chest Pain Who Were Suspected of Acute Myocardial Infarction - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marina Arai, Yuichiro Minami, Junichi Yamaguchi, Akihito Tanaka, Kunihiro Matsuo, Toshiaki Mano, Sunao Kojima, Kiyotaka Hao, Takuya Taniguchi, Kazuya Tateishi and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marina AraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan.
Yuichiro MinamiDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan.
Junichi YamaguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan.
Akihito TanakaDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.
Kunihiro MatsuoDepartment of Cardiology, Fukuoka Tokushukai Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Toshiaki ManoCardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Sunao KojimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sakurajyuji Yatsushiro Rehabilitation Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Kiyotaka HaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai Japan.
Takuya TaniguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Otsu City Hospital Shiga Japan.
Kazuya TateishiDepartment of Cardiology, Chiba University Hospital Chiba Japan.
Rie AoyamaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center Chiba Japan.
Masashi YokoseDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Teruo NoguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.
Yasushi TsujimotoScientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG) Osaka Japan.
Tetsuya MatobaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Fukuoka Japan.
Toshikazu FunazakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kawaguchi Cupola Rehabilitation Hospital Saitama Japan.
Yoshio TaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi NonogiPharmaceutical Science, University of Shizuoka Shizuoka Japan.
Migaku KikuchiEmergency and Critical Care Center, Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC) Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Task Force and the Guideline Editorial Committee on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Emergency and Critical Care Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care (POC) cardiac troponin testing, although less sensitive than high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, allows for rapid bedside evaluation. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of POC troponin tests for both ruling in and ruling out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at the time of patient presentation. Methods and Results: In accordance with PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 17, 2023. We included all studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of POC troponin assays for identifying AMI among adult patients. Among the 551 studies initially screened, 6 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy based on these 6 observational datasets demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 47% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-49%) and 90% (95% CI 89-90%), respectively, for AMI detection. In a subgroup meta-analysis of non-ST-segment elevation MI using 4 observational datasets, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 48% (95% CI 45-50%) and 89% (95% CI 89-90%), respectively. Conclusions: These findings emphasize that the clinical application of POC troponin assays in AMI diagnosis must consider the test's robust specificity (≈90%) alongside its limited sensitivity (<50%).

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac troponinPoint-of-carePooled sensitivityPooled specificity

Identifiers

PMID41216395
PMCPMC12597238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.