ArticleWellcome open research2025
Linking behaviour change techniques to mechanisms of action: Using the Theory and Techniques Tool alongside the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Universal interventions to improve young children's mental well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Measuring processes of change in behavioural interventions: Insights gained from linking mechanisms of action to associated measures.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Understanding how interventions work requires clear hypotheses, rigorous testing, and accurate reporting of links between behaviour change techniques (BCTs)-the smallest replicable active components of interventions-and mechanisms of action (MoAs), the processes through which behaviour changes. The Theory and Techniques Tool (TaTT) provides a grid of likely BCT-MoA links to guide intervention design, based on literature synthesis and expert consensus. Recently, the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology development team introduced detailed, computer-readable lower-level ontologies for BCTs and MoAs, but limited guidance exists on integrating the BCT-MoA links proposed by the TaTT with these ontologies. This study aimed to map BCTs and MoAs from the TaTT to corresponding classes (i.e., categorisations or groupings) in the Behaviour Change Technique Ontology (BCTO) and Mechanism of Action (MoA) Ontology. Methods: Three researchers mapped the classes from the BCTO onto 74 BCTs within the TaTT, using their definitions. Similarly, two researchers mapped classes from the MoA Ontology onto the 26 MoAs within the TaTT. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion with senior researchers. Subsequent updates to the BCT and MoA Ontologies necessitated a researcher updating the mappings, with the revisions being verified by the research team. Results: From the BCTO, 85 BCTs were mapped to the 74 BCTs present in the TaTT, while 56 MoAs from the MoA Ontology were mapped to the 26 MoAs present in the TaTT. Subclasses of these 85 BCTs and 56 MoAs provide additional specificity and can be found by further engaging with these ontologies. Discussion: Mapping the TaTT to the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology enhances clarity and precision in selecting and reporting BCT-MoA links, enabling integration of data across frameworks. Future work should maintain these mappings as ontologies evolve and users provide more feedback and evidence on BCTs, MoAs and their links, ensuring they remain relevant and user-friendly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.