ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Machine learning approach to predict 1-year mortality after heart transplantation: a single-centre study.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Heart transplantation is a critical life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage heart failure. However, predicting postoperative mortality remains challenging. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models for predicting 1-year mortality among heart transplant recipients in Saudi Arabia. Methods and results: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, a large tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia, that included all heart transplant cases from January 2007 to December 2022. We evaluate and compare the accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR) models in predicting 1-year mortality. We also identify key predictive variables influencing mortality rates among recipients. SVM and LR models were developed and compared using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as performance metrics. The study analysed data from 419 patients, revealing that ischaemia time, devices like left ventricle assist device, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and body mass index (BMI) were significant mortality predictors. The LR model showed a testing accuracy of 96.43%, with weight and BMI having the strongest influence on mortality prediction. The SVM model had a testing accuracy of 95.24%, demonstrating consistent performance across dataset. Conclusion: The findings indicate that ML models, particularly SVM and LR, are effective in predicting 1-year mortality post-heart transplantation as well as identifying significant predictors of mortality. This research contributes to the global knowledge in heart transplant and highlights the importance of new technologies in tailoring healthcare strategies for the Saudi population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.