Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216324›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2024

Clinical Pharmaceutical Reasoning in Hospital Pharmacy Practice using the DRIP framework: a New Approach for a Perfectionist Profession.

Heleen van der Sijs, Midas B Mulder

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heleen van der SijsHospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-0999
Midas B MulderHospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0925-3771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical pharmacists are responsible for safe medication use in hospitals. Most clinical pharmacists are perfectionists. However, in their decision-making process, they have to embrace uncertainty, while interpreting available data, and integrating knowledge and clinical experience. In clinical practice, how to teach and master clinical pharmaceutical reasoning is unclear. We developed the DRIP framework including different aspects on drug, indication and patient and a stepwise approach to support clinical pharmaceutical reasoning by students, residents in hospital pharmacy and clinical pharmacists. The DRIP framework was first introduced during the daily report with residents and faculty of the clinical pharmacy. The framework was implemented in daily clinical practice to handle drug safety alerts, and to optimise drug therapy during ward rounds, multidisciplinary consultations, and in entrustmentbased discussions with residents. Pharmacists using the DRIP framework felt more confident that relevant aspects of a complex pharmaceutical problem had been considered, they learned to anticipate on the issues behind an apparently simple pharmaceutical question, and to explain their reasoning. Several CANMEDS roles can be simultaneously trained by using our approach. We are developing a course for residents in clinical pharmacy and pharmacology to teach the competency of clinical pharmaceutical reasoning using the DRIP framework.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacyclinical reasoningmedication safetypharmacy education

Identifiers

PMID41216324
PMCPMC12596546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.