ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Evolution of Disease Burden in Severe Asthma Patients by Biological Treatment Status: Interim Analysis of the BREATHE Study.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this work was to describe the disease characteristics and evolution over time among severe asthma patients in Spain, with and without biologic treatment, based on the interim analysis of the BREATHE study. Methods: The BREATHE study is a multicentre, observational, longitudinal cohort study conducted in Spain, involving patients aged ≥12 years with severe asthma, who were treated with high doses of ICS + LABA for at least 6 months prior to inclusion. This interim analysis was carried out with the information from the baseline and retrospective visits (at 6 and 12 months prior to index date) collected on June 29, 2023, including sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, lung function, symptoms, laboratory assessments, and treatment regimens. Results: The interim analysis of the BREATHE study included 344 patients, with 325 meeting all criteria for analysis. The study found that 50.8% of patients had partially or poorly controlled asthma according to the ACT score, with a higher percentage of well-controlled asthma in patients undergoing biological therapy (52.5%) compared to those without (45.0%). Despite biological treatment, patients continued to experience exacerbations, and the most common treatments at the index date were ICS/LABA, biological therapy, and antileukotrienes. Conclusion: The interim analysis of the BREATHE study reveals that severe asthma patients in Spain, predominantly female and around 50 years old, continue to experience exacerbations despite biological therapy, with nearly half having poorly controlled asthma. The study highlights the need to reassess treatment strategies for patients with high biomarker levels and frequent exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.