ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Clinical features and current treatment approach to ulcerative proctitis.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A bibliometric analysis of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by persistent inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Ulcerative proctitis (UP), a localized subtype limited to the rectum, accounts for approximately 37% of UC cases. Although often considered less severe than more extensive forms of UC, UP poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its distinct clinical course and the limited availability of targeted research. UP significantly impairs patients' quality of life, yet randomized controlled trials (RCTs) frequently exclude this population, leading to a paucity of high-quality data to guide management. Diagnostic criteria for UP require endoscopic and histopathological confirmation of inflammation confined to within 15 cm of the anal verge once other etiologies are excluded. First-line treatment typically includes topical 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) and corticosteroids, which have demonstrated efficacy in inducing remission. For refractory cases, advanced therapies, including biologics and small-molecule agents, offer promising options, though robust evidence specific to UP is limited. This review underscores the gaps in contemporary UP research, including variability in study designs, definitions, and outcome measures, which hinder meta-analyses and the development of standardized treatment guidelines. Furthermore, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring and the long-term benefits of mucosal healing remain unclear in UP. Personalized treatment strategies, informed by disease severity, patient preferences, and access to care are essential. Regular surveillance incorporating clinical and endoscopic assessments is critical to optimize disease control and mitigate complications. Future studies are necessary to define treatment targets, evaluate novel therapies, and establish evidence-based guidelines to improve outcomes for patients with UP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.