Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216274›Full record

ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment of LPAC presenting as post cholecystectomy pain: rationale and design of a randomised trial.

Andrew Trinh, Tony Speer, Danny Liew, Robert Gibson, Douglas Tjandra, Dean McKenzie, Alex Boussioutas, Daniel D Buchanan, Andrew J Metz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew TrinhDepartment of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital and The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tony SpeerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Danny LiewDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Robert GibsonDepartment of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Douglas TjandraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Dean McKenzieDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alex BoussioutasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel D BuchananColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew J MetzDepartment of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital and The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post cholecystectomy pain is a common clinical problem. Investigation and management of patients with recurrent episodes of biliary pain and normal imaging is challenging. Low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) is a recently described syndrome that often presents with difficult to manage episodes of post cholecystectomy pain. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment of LPAC is supported by animal studies and case series but has not been assessed in a randomised trial. Methods: This protocol presents the design and rationale for an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase 3 crossover trial: Ursodeoxycholic acid in LPAC treating Recurrent Abdominal Pain (ULTRA Pain). The study population consists of 24 patients with difficult to manage post cholecystectomy pain diagnosed with LPAC with no or minimal changes on liver ultrasound imaging. Participants will be recruited through the gastroenterology clinic at Royal Melbourne Hospital and randomly assigned to receive UDCA 10 mg/kg daily for 1 year followed by a matched placebo, or vice versa, separated by an effective 6-week washout period. The primary endpoint is the number of patient reported episodes of biliary pain. Secondary outcomes include the number of episodes of biliary pain with associated transiently elevated liver function tests (LFTs), and episodes of biliary pain in those with the diagnosis of LPAC confirmed by ultrasound, the Recurrent Abdominal Pain Intensity and Disability (RAPID) score, and the score of several questionnaires measuring quality of life. An independent monitor has been appointed to oversee safety of participants. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. Regression methods appropriate to the type of primary or secondary outcome, such as linear regression for continuous outcome or Poisson or negative binomial regression if found to be skewed, or binary logistic regression for binary outcomes will be employed. Alpha or level of statistical significance will be set to p <0.05 and 95% confidence intervals will be reported throughout. Discussion: This trial will provide level 1 evidence on the efficacy of UDCA in treating LPAC presenting with post cholecystectomy pain. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000450819).

Indexed as

adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily B, member 4Low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis (LPAC)post cholecystectomy painrandomised control trialursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)

Identifiers

PMID41216274
PMCPMC12596452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.