Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216217›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

GeoGenIE: a deep learning approach to predict geographic provenance of biodiversity samples from genomic SNPs.

Bradley T Martin, Zachery D Zbinden, Michael E Douglas, Marlis R Douglas, Tyler K Chafin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bradley T MartinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-4692
Zachery D ZbindenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-224X
Michael E DouglasDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-7825
Marlis R DouglasDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-3939
Tyler K ChafinBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-5905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Determining geographic origin of samples is a common objective in wildlife management, forensics, and conservation. Current methods often assume evolutionary models or require extensive reference datasets, which are costly and difficult to develop, that perform poorly with uneven or biased sampling. Supervised deep learning offers a promising alternative by learning complex patterns without prior model specifications. Combined with novel geo-genetic data augmentation and preprocessing techniques, it can reduce reference panel demands and improve performance across diverse sampling schemes, broadening accurate provenance determination to more study systems. Results: We present GeoGenIE, an open-source software package powered by PyTorch for geographic provenance prediction from genomic data. GeoGenIE implements a multilayer perceptron architecture within an automated hyperparameter tuning framework, incorporating preprocessing, geo-genetic outlier detection, and data augmentation to improve accuracy in sparsely sampled regions. Benchmarking against a comparable approach with White-tailed deer ( Availability and implementation: Open-source at https://github.com/btmartin721/geogenie and https://pypi.org/project/GeoGenIE/.

Identifiers

PMID41216217
PMCPMC12596584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.