ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025
The current status and influence factors of research ability among community nurses: A sequential qualitative-quantitative study.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: The study used a sequential qualitative-quantitative research design to develop a survey tool that explores the current situation and influencing factors of community nurses' research ability. Methods: The qualitative research developed the Chinese Community Nurses Research Ability Tool (CCN-RAT) through face-to-face interviews. The quantitative research tests the current situation and influencing factors of research ability among community nurses. One-way ANOVA and Multiple Linear Regression were used to analyze the results. Results: The Cronbach's Conclusion: CCN-RAT could help nurses, educators, students, and other populations to better understand the current situation and influencing factors of research ability, which could provide targeted research training to improve research ability for public health staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.