ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Protocol-based postoperative brain scan after drainage of chronic subdural hematoma in a low-resource setting (ProtoScan study).
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan in chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) management is not supported by literature. Yet, many institutions perform routine postoperative scans for several reasons. The dangers are potential for abuse, healthcare cost, and unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on patients who had surgery for cSDH between January 2021 and December 2023. Number of postoperative CT, complication rate, average length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, and functional outcome were analyzed. Results: One hundred and six patients had surgery and 6 months follow-up record after surgery. There were 89 males (84%) and 17 females (16%). Of the 11 (10.38%) patients who had postoperative brain CT, three had postoperative scan due to new neurological deficits, four did not improve 48 h after surgery, one had cortical injury, and three had initial improvement but then deteriorated within 1 week. Our data showed recurrence in 7 (6.6%) patients, deep vein thrombosis 2 (1.9%), and wound infection and subdural empyema 1 (0.9%). Duration of hospital admission significantly affected complication; 5.9% in patients who stayed <7 days on admission against 18.4% in those who stayed more than 7 days ( Conclusion: Routine brain CT scan after uncomplicated drainage of cSDH in patients without new neurological symptoms adds no value. A rational clinical approach based on neurologic evaluation should guide the decision on a postoperative scan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.