Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216107›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Missed on X-ray, Found on CT: A Retrospective Study on the Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Consequences of Occult Posterior Malleolus Fractures in Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Hariprasath Kanesan, Zain Choudhary, Sachin Singal, Mahesh Kanesan, Ronald Hang-Kin Nam, Niranj Ganeshan Radhamony, Mohamed Hamadto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hariprasath KanesanOrthopedics and Trauma, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, GBR.
Zain ChoudharyOrthopedics and Trauma, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, GBR.
Sachin SingalOrthopedics and Trauma, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, GBR.
Mahesh KanesanSurgery, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, GBR.
Ronald Hang-Kin NamOrthopedics and Trauma, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, GBR.
Niranj Ganeshan RadhamonyOrthopedics and Trauma, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, GBR.
Mohamed HamadtoOrthopedics and Trauma, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) are common in distal tibial shaft fractures yet are frequently occult on plain radiographs. Accurate preoperative characterization on CT may improve surgical planning and functional recovery. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults (≥18 years) with mid- or distal tibial shaft fractures treated at a major trauma center (January 2022-December 2024). Demographics, imaging, fracture characteristics, management, and outcomes were abstracted. PMF detection was compared across radiography, CT, and intraoperative findings. Predictors of a posterior malleolus (PM) fragment being missed on radiography were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. Among operatively treated cases, the effect of fixation strategy on postoperative full weight‑bearing (FWB) was analyzed with a logistic model including fixation, PM status, and their interaction; pairwise, covariate‑adjusted contrasts (emmeans with Tukey correction) compared strategies. An exploratory random forest provided permutation‑importance rankings. Findings PMFs were present in 147/387 fractures (38.0%), more often in women (60.5%), closed injuries (76.9%), and distal fractures (98.0%). Radiography identified 116/147 PMFs (78.9%), and CT 120/147 (81.6%); 29/147 (19.7%) fragments were missed on radiographs but detected on CT or intraoperatively. Missed fragments were most frequent in undisplaced and intermediate‑sized (33-50%) fragments; CT identified all posteromedial and >50% fragments. In adjusted analyses, fracture morphology was the principal correlate of radiographic omission: oblique patterns were less likely to be missed (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.60), whereas other demographic and injury variables were not significant. Among operatively managed fractures, intramedullary nailing was associated with the highest likelihood of achieving FWB and was statistically superior to plate and external fixation in pairwise, covariate‑adjusted comparisons; the relative ranking of fixation methods did not differ by PM involvement. Neither PMF location (posteromedial, posterolateral, or undisplaced) nor fragment size independently predicted FWB, infection, or mal‑/non‑union. Conclusions Approximately two in five distal tibial shaft fractures harbour a PM fragment, and nearly one in five PMFs are occult on initial radiographs, particularly when undisplaced or of intermediate size. CT modestly increases detection and ensures complete characterisation of posteromedial and large fragments, supporting a low threshold for pre‑operative CT in distal tibial fractures.

Indexed as

ct-imagingdistal tibia fractureorif distal tibia fibulaposterior malleolus fracturetibial shaft fracturetibia nailx-ray images

Identifiers

PMID41216107
PMCPMC12596702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.