ArticleCureus2025
Self-Urinary Catheter Removal for Urology Day Cases: A Safe, Efficient, Sustainable, and Patient-Centred Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Urology day procedures need a significant proportion of patients to have an indwelling catheter for a substantial time post-procedure. Self-catheter removal offers better patient care for both patients and healthcare, while contributing to the sustainability goals of the National Health Service (NHS). Patient and methods This project has been used to remove a urethral catheter at home for patients who need a catheter after their surgery for over 12 hours and are expected to pass urine naturally post-catheter removal. From June 2024 to July 2025, 180 patients (average age: 63.1; range: 35-85) were included to carry out this retrospective audit, excluding those with post-procedural complications needing clinical supervision, frail patients, patients living alone, and patients unable to use the mobile application. Results In the study cohort, all patients were successful in removing their catheter at home and did not need to attend the accident and emergency (A&E) within 30 days for catheter-related issues. In the initial 44 patients, we analysed patient feedback, and 96% of the patients were happy to refer others for the service, with no reported difficulty related to catheter removal. This project improved same-day discharge rates from 41% (91 out of 220 patients) to 55% (150 out of 210 patients) for the Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP) procedure, saving about 1.7 tons of carbon emissions in total, while potentially saving 20.32£ of travel cost for hospital attendance per patient. Conclusion Although self-removal of a catheter is endorsed by standard practice in England, this study shows the appropriateness of the service for urology day cases, as there is a knowledge gap in the existing published reports. Also, suggest potential implications in other indications of catheter removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.