Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216087›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Decade Long Struggle: A Young Man's Journey From Renal Transplant to Fatal Refractory Ascites.

Sarah I Zahid, Nadia I Zahid, Mazaffar I Zahid, Imran Zahid

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah I ZahidInternal Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Nadia I ZahidFamily Medicine, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, USA.
Mazaffar I ZahidInternal Medicine, Gulf Medical Univeristy, Ajman, ARE.
Imran ZahidNephrology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City (SSMC), Abu Dhabu, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case details the clinical course of a 33-year-old man with a history of living with an unrelated renal transplant, who presented with recurrent, massive ascites to be drained every two to three weeks for two years. His post-transplant course was also complicated by chronic antibody-mediated rejection, evidenced by a terminal increase in serum creatinine and a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Cross-sectional imaging revealed complete obliteration of his central veins and a hypertrophied, edematous transplant kidney anastomosed to the common iliac artery. These findings, in the absence of cirrhosis or cardiac failure, pointed towards renal lymphangiectasia as a consequence of venous outflow obstruction and possible iatrogenic lymphatic injury as the cause of his refractory ascites. This case reinforces the critical role of venous and lymphatic pathology in the differential diagnosis of post-transplant ascites and demonstrates how a multifactorial interaction can lead to a disastrous clinical scenario.

Indexed as

central venous occlusionliving donor renal transplantlymphatic obstructionrefractory ascitesrenal lymphangiectasiatransplant nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID41216087
PMCPMC12597023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.