Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216082›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Photic Maculopathy Caused by a Laser Pointer.

Gagandeep Naral, Shikha B Shetty, Sripathi Kamath, Madhurima Nayak

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gagandeep NaralOphthalmology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, IND.
Shikha B ShettyOphthalmology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, IND.
Sripathi KamathOphthalmology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, IND.
Madhurima NayakOphthalmology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser pointers are easily available devices and are frequently used for teaching and presentation purposes. We present a case of photic maculopathy in a man in his 20s who came with central scotoma and blurred vision in the right eye following accidental exposure to a red laser pointer. Visual acuity of the affected eye was 20/30 and N8. On examination of the fundus, a yellowish foveal lesion was seen. The Amsler grid test revealed a central scotoma. Fundus autofluorescence showed hyperfluorescence with central hypofluorescence. A diagnosis of photic maculopathy was made based on characteristic findings on optical coherence tomography. On follow-up, the size of the lesion decreased. However, the patient complained of a persisting scotoma. This case highlights the public health importance of creating awareness among people regarding the strict regulations on the unscrupulous use of laser pointers to prevent vision loss.

Indexed as

650 nmcentral scotomalaseroptical coherence tomographyphotic maculopathy

Identifiers

PMID41216082
PMCPMC12597123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.