Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216080›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Third-Generation Cognitive and Behavioral Therapies for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Narrative Review.

Pedro Veloso, Filipa Pereira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pedro VelosoPsychiatry, Hospital De Braga, Braga, PRT.
Filipa PereiraPsychiatry, Hospital De Braga, Braga, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and disabling condition associated with significant distress and functional impairment. First-line treatments rely primarily on pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), particularly exposure and response prevention (ERP). Although effective, a substantial proportion of patients continue to show clinically significant symptoms after treatment. In recent decades, alternative psychological therapies have been investigated to complement CBT and address its limitations in OCD management. This narrative review, based on the relevant literature indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE from 2003 to 2023, examines the evidence on third-generation therapies in OCD, with a focus on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), mindfulness-based therapy (MBT), and metacognitive therapy (MCT). Across study designs ranging from case reports to randomized controlled trials, these interventions have shown potential to reduce OCD symptoms, alleviate comorbid depression and anxiety, improve maladaptive beliefs, and enhance psychological flexibility. Despite promising findings, the evidence remains preliminary and constrained by small samples, heterogeneous designs, variable control conditions, and limited long-term data. Comparative studies with established first-line treatments are relatively few and show mixed findings, limiting conclusions about relative efficacy. Larger, well-controlled randomized trials with standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up are needed to establish efficacy and clarify the role of third-generation therapies within OCD treatment algorithms.

Indexed as

acceptance and commitment therapycognitive-behavioral therapymetacognitionmindfulnessobsessive-compulsive disorder

Identifiers

PMID41216080
PMCPMC12597211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.