ArticleCureus2025
Students' Reflection on Online Clinical Scenario Sessions As Complementary to Online Anatomy Practical Sessions During the COVID-19 Pandemic at the University of Khartoum in 2021.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid shift to virtual teaching in medical education. At the Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, all face-to-face sessions were replaced with online instruction during the second wave to reduce transmission risks. This study aimed to evaluate student reflections on the use of online clinical scenarios as a complementary tool to virtual anatomy practical sessions. Methods A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted among first-year medical students. Five online clinical scenarios were delivered synchronously via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA) to supplement virtual anatomy teaching. At the end of the academic year, students' satisfaction and feedback were gathered using a structured, self-administered questionnaire developed through Google Forms (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA). Results More than half of the respondents (52.7%, n = 68) agreed or strongly agreed that the sessions enhanced their retention of anatomical knowledge and facilitated the study of gross anatomy, while 17.1% (n = 22) disagreed or strongly disagreed (p = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.45-0.60). The perceived effectiveness of the online clinical scenarios was comparable to traditional face-to-face sessions, with nearly two-thirds of participants (64.3%, n = 83) recommending their continued use (p = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.58-0.70). Conclusion Students responded positively to the incorporation of online clinical scenarios, viewing them as effective and comparable to conventional teaching methods. These findings support the integration of case-based learning into virtual anatomy education during and beyond pandemic-related disruptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.