ArticleCureus2025
Safety of Thread Lifting With APTOS and Energy-Based Technologies Under Artificial Intelligence-Guided High-Frequency Ultrasound.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Suspension threads composed of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) are widely used for nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Accurate placement within the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is essential to reduce risks and optimize outcomes. Real-time high-frequency ultrasound with artificial intelligence (AI) may assist procedural accuracy. The safety of combining thread lifting with energy-based technologies, performed on the same day, remains underreported. Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate the overall safety of APTOS PLLA/PCL threads (APTOS Excellence Visage®; APTOS LLC, Tbilisi, Georgia) placed under AI-guided high-frequency ultrasound, with or without the use of energy-based modalities on the same day, in a real-world aesthetic practice. Methods This retrospective, single-center observational study included 246 patients who underwent facial thread lifting with APTOS Excellence Visage sutures under real-time ultrasound guidance. A portion of the patients received same-day energy-based treatments (linear focused ultrasound, monopolar radiofrequency, or CO₂ laser). Safety outcomes were assessed over 180 days. All patients were analyzed as a single cohort. Results The overall incidence of adverse events was below 5%, with no serious or irreversible complications. Reported events included self-limited postoperative pain (4.1%), ecchymosis (2.0%), hematomas (0.8%), and granulomas (1.6%). No cases of infection, thread extrusion, allergic reaction, or thread removal were observed. Ultrasound guidance confirmed accurate SMAS-plane placement in all procedures. Conclusions Thread lifting with PLLA/PCL sutures demonstrated a favorable safety profile when performed under AI-assisted ultrasound guidance. The use of real-time imaging enhanced anatomical precision. The combination of threads with same-day energy-based modalities was also safe, with no increase in complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.