ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Evaluating the Impact of a Preoperative Risk Management Program on Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total joint arthroplasty is an effective intervention for end-stage joint disease, but carries elevated risks for patients with comorbidities and those from historically marginalized populations. Preoperative risk management programs are designed to mitigate these risks by optimizing patient health prior to surgery. This study evaluated the impact of such a program on postoperative outcomes at a single academic institution, with attention to racial and ethnic minorities and patients with public insurance. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2748 patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty between 2019 and 2021 at a single academic institution. Of these, 1548 patients received preoperative optimization targeting modifiable risk factors such as diabetes, obesity, and anemia, while 1200 followed standard preoperative protocols. Outcomes assessed included length of stay, prosthetic joint infection, 30- and 90-day readmissions, and emergency department (ED) visits. Patients were stratified by race/ethnicity, insurance type, and American Society of Anesthesiology physical classification. Results: The optimized cohort had a higher average Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.1 vs 0.9; Conclusions: Preoperative risk management did not consistently improve outcomes, particularly among patients with greater comorbidity burdens or those facing socioeconomic disadvantage. These findings support the need for tailored optimization strategies that address both clinical risk and social determinants of health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.