Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41215990›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2025

Understanding Surgeon Professionalism in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study in a Multicultural and Resource-Limited Context.

Daniel Ardian Soeselo, Retno Asti Werdhani, Toar Jean Maurice Lalisang, Agus Purwadianto, Wirsma Arif Harahap, Rennie Yolanda, Theddeus Octavianus Hari Prasetyono, Diantha Soemantri, Ardi Findyartini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel Ardian SoeseloDepartment of Surgery and Medical Education Unit, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Retno Asti WerdhaniDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Toar Jean Maurice LalisangDepartment of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Agus PurwadiantoDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Medicolegal Studies, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wirsma Arif HarahapDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.
Rennie YolandaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Theddeus Octavianus Hari PrasetyonoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Diantha SoemantriDepartment of Medical Education and Medical Education Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ardi FindyartiniDepartment of Medical Education and Medical Education Center, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surgeons' professionalism is vital for ensuring safe surgical care, particularly in Indonesia, where cultural and systemic factors present unique challenges to healthcare delivery. Professionalism affects surgical outcomes, patient safety, and interprofessional collaboration directly. This study represents the first national-level exploration of surgical professionalism, involving culturally diverse participants from various regions. To explore how healthcare professionals and patients perceive surgeon professionalism in Indonesia, emphasizing cultural and systemic influences. Methods: This qualitative study employed a phenomenological approach to capture the lived experiences and perspectives of informants regarding surgeons' professionalism. This study was conducted at public, private, and military healthcare institutions in Indonesia, including type B, C, and D hospitals, as well as specialty hospitals. A total of 27 participants, including surgeons, anesthesiologists, pediatricians, internists, operating room nurses, ward nurses, hospital management, and patient representatives, were recruited through snowball sampling to ensure diverse perspectives. In-depth interviews were conducted to elicit the participants' perceptions of surgeons' professionalism in their healthcare context. Reflexivity and triangulation methods were applied to ensure validity and minimize bias. The study identified key themes and sub-themes of professionalism as perceived by participants, highlighting non-technical aspects of surgeon professionalism in Indonesia. Results: Four non-technical themes of surgeon professionalism were identified: fulfilling roles and responsibilities, upholding integrity, having good communication skills, and engaging in multidisciplinary collaboration. These aspects were influenced by cultural values and systemic challenges, including disparities in healthcare resources. Conclusions: Surgeons' professionalism in Indonesia is shaped by cultural and structural factors distinct from global standards. The findings provide insights for culturally sensitive interventions that enhance professionalism and surgical care quality in Indonesia. Addressing these unique dynamics is essential for improving patient safety, healthcare outcomes, and professional relationships.

Indexed as

Continuing medical educationEducationProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID41215990
PMCPMC12596393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.