Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41215987›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Toward precision stroke rehabilitation: an integrated causal machine learning and clinician feedback approach.

Aaron Baird, Houping Xiao, Yusen Xia, Chloe Sellers, Katheryn Metzger, Karen Patterson, Liv Nyankori, Raeda Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aaron BairdDepartment of Computer Information Systems, College of Business, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-2926
Houping XiaoInstitute for Insight, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Yusen XiaInstitute for Insight, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Chloe SellersCrawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, United States.
Katheryn MetzgerAcquired Brain Injury Program, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, United States.
Karen PattersonAcquired Brain Injury Program, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, United States.
Liv NyankoriAcquired Brain Injury Program, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, United States.
Raeda AndersonCrawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify causal mechanisms driving variations in the impact of rehabilitation treatments on stroke survivors' independence improvement during rehabilitation inpatient stays. Materials and Methods: Iterative cycles of clinical input and causal machine learning (causal ML) were employed toward the goal of identifying relevant heterogeneous treatment effects. Data were from stroke patients ( Results: We find heterogeneity in rehabilitation treatment effects for a number of patient subgroups. Patient subgroups found to have the most heterogeneity in treatment effects were those with a bilateral involvement stroke location and those with diabetes. In a small minority of cases, we also observe heterogeneous treatment effects for those of older age, males versus females, and stroke location on either the right or left side of the brain. In regard to therapies, those related to mental health (ie, psychotherapy and spiritual/chaplaincy) had the most positive uplift in independence outcomes by the end of inpatient rehabilitation stays. Discussion: Stroke survivors have varying responses to stroke rehabilitation treatments. We show that heterogeneous treatment effects are indeed present in rehabilitation. Identification of specific mechanisms, such as stroke location and provisioning of mental health services, is made possible through the use of causal ML applied to observational data in stroke rehabilitation. Conclusions: Causal ML can help to identify the mechanisms driving independence outcome variation. However, the large number of effects discovered and the small size of many effects make clinician feedback of paramount importance. Use of causal ML with clinician feedback throughout the process improves identification of appropriate measures and selection of relevant results.

Indexed as

clinician feedbackindependencemachine learningrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID41215987
PMCPMC12597139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.