ArticleJAMIA open2025
Toward precision stroke rehabilitation: an integrated causal machine learning and clinician feedback approach.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fairness-aware K-means clustering in digital mental health for higher education students: a generalizable framework for equitable clustering.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- A Compensatory-Topology and Relay-Gating Graph Network for multimodal stroke rehabilitation assessment.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify causal mechanisms driving variations in the impact of rehabilitation treatments on stroke survivors' independence improvement during rehabilitation inpatient stays. Materials and Methods: Iterative cycles of clinical input and causal machine learning (causal ML) were employed toward the goal of identifying relevant heterogeneous treatment effects. Data were from stroke patients ( Results: We find heterogeneity in rehabilitation treatment effects for a number of patient subgroups. Patient subgroups found to have the most heterogeneity in treatment effects were those with a bilateral involvement stroke location and those with diabetes. In a small minority of cases, we also observe heterogeneous treatment effects for those of older age, males versus females, and stroke location on either the right or left side of the brain. In regard to therapies, those related to mental health (ie, psychotherapy and spiritual/chaplaincy) had the most positive uplift in independence outcomes by the end of inpatient rehabilitation stays. Discussion: Stroke survivors have varying responses to stroke rehabilitation treatments. We show that heterogeneous treatment effects are indeed present in rehabilitation. Identification of specific mechanisms, such as stroke location and provisioning of mental health services, is made possible through the use of causal ML applied to observational data in stroke rehabilitation. Conclusions: Causal ML can help to identify the mechanisms driving independence outcome variation. However, the large number of effects discovered and the small size of many effects make clinician feedback of paramount importance. Use of causal ML with clinician feedback throughout the process improves identification of appropriate measures and selection of relevant results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.