ReviewGland surgery2025
Optimizing venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in abdominal-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review of evidence and practice.
Review in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in surgical patients, with individuals undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction representing a particularly high-risk group. Despite the widespread use of risk assessment tools such as the Caprini Risk Assessment Model (RAM), prophylaxis strategies remain inconsistent across institutions. This literature review aims to synthesize current literature on VTE incidence, risk stratification, and chemoprophylaxis in abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction to identify best practices and areas for future research. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed, focusing on studies evaluating VTE incidence, prevention strategies, and outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction. Emphasis was placed on risk stratification models, pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis, and the timing, dosing, and duration of anticoagulation regimens. Key Content and Findings: Validated tools such as the Caprini RAM effectively stratify surgical patients by VTE risk; however, specific recommendations for abdominal-based reconstruction are lacking. Extended-duration prophylaxis appears beneficial in high-risk patients, with recent studies supporting preoperative initiation. Despite concerns about flap loss or hematoma, evidence suggests that appropriately dosed chemoprophylaxis does not significantly increase complications. Oral agents like apixaban show promise for improving adherence without increased bleeding risk. The majority of VTE events occur after discharge, supporting the rationale for outpatient prophylaxis. Future directions include machine learning-enhanced risk prediction and multicenter trials to standardize prophylaxis. Conclusions: Patients undergoing abdominal-based breast reconstruction face substantial VTE risk, and tailored chemoprophylaxis is essential. While current evidence supports individualized risk-based strategies, practice variability underscores the need for a standardized chemoprophylaxis algorithm. Future prospective studies are critical to establish optimal prophylaxis regimens, timing, and duration in this high-risk surgical population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.