Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41215851›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2025

Artificial intelligence in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery training within plastic surgery: A systematic review.

Cheuk Ying Kyleen Kiew, Anuska Shah, Michalis Hadjiandreou, Georgios Pafitanis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheuk Ying Kyleen KiewFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Ayrton Road, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Anuska ShahFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Ayrton Road, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Michalis HadjiandreouDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Andrew's Centre, Broomfield Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Court Road, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Georgios PafitanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Royal London Hospital Microsurgery Unit, Bart's Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into plastic surgery. Technical complexities of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery demand incorporation of AI in facilitating steep learning curves. Although simulation models exist, many provide inadequate preparation and fidelity. AI has potential to complement trainee efforts in skill acquisition by improving training efficacy. This systematic review aims to present and evaluate applications and future of AI in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery plastic surgery training. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Studies on AI applications on microsurgery and supermicrosurgery training within plastic surgery were included. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool. AI model architecture and motion, eye and instrument tracking parameters and narrative data synthesis were captured on Microsoft Excel. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42025607695). Results: Five articles were included. Two articles developed automated microsurgical skill classification datasets with force-based surgical glove model achieving above 95 % accuracy. Two AI applications used eye tracking parameters namely, blink rate, pupil dilation and gaze coordination to assess proficiency and workload. Path length, mean velocity and jerk curvature were accurately analyzed by AI models with instrument and hand tracking. All studies reported moderate risk of bias. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review addressing AI applications in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery training. AI models tracking eye, hand and instrument motion for microsurgical skill assessment demonstrated accuracy and precision, enabling real-time monitoring of proficiency and workload, which are scalable, objective methods for improving training and outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEducationMicrosurgerySupermicrosurgeryTraining

Identifiers

PMID41215851
PMCPMC12596538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.