ArticleAME case reports2025
Forty years between contralateral bullectomies for giant pulmonary bullae: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Giant pulmonary bullae (GPB) are a rare manifestation of emphysema that often requires procedural intervention. Operative management of GPB has been shown to significantly improve quality of life and pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters. These improvements have been shown to persist for years, with a gradual decline associated with the progression of emphysema. For those with GPB who have had a pneumothorax, a future contralateral pneumothorax is more common in those with contralateral blebs. We present the unique case of a patient with GPB who required contralateral bullectomy 40 years after his first. Case Description: A 63-year-old man with a history of left-sided bullectomy in 1986 who was lost to follow-up presented in 2021 with progressive dyspnea on exertion. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a giant bulla occupying >50% of the right thorax, causing ipsilateral atelectasis and contralateral tracheal shift. Also present was a right-sided pneumothorax and a left-sided hilar mass. Biopsy of this mass was negative for malignancy, and it self-resolved on subsequent imaging. He re-established as an outpatient, and four months later was directly admitted from clinic for hypoxic respiratory failure. Follow-up CT imaging demonstrated minimal interval change over 1.5 years. He continued outpatient follow-up, and by 2023, had reduced his smoking and participated in pulmonary rehab. PFT demonstrated a moderately severe obstructive ventilatory defect with evidence of heterogeneity of ventilation but remained stable from 1/2023 to 8/2024. His dyspnea on exertion and oxygen requirement (4 L/min) were stable in this interval. He presented in 8/2024 for elective video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with right upper lobe bullectomy and right middle lobe wedge resection. At follow-up 4 months later, his O Conclusions: Bullectomy remains an effective treatment for dyspnea in patients with GPB. Prophylactic management of contralateral blebs remains an ongoing debate, though primarily in the context of pneumothorax. Advancements in medical and surgical management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have expanded the length of time patients should be closely monitored for consideration of procedural intervention for GPB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.