ReviewEco-Environment & Health2025
Importance of control experiments in toxicity test of metal-organic frameworks: Recent advances and challenges.
Review in Eco-Environment & Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal-Organic Frameworks in Food Biotechnology: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives for Probiotic Delivery, Precision Fermentation, and Circular Food Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metal-Organic Framework-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The commercial application of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in gas separation, catalysis, sensing, energy conversion, and storage inevitably leads to the release of MOFs into the environment, posing a great threat to the eco-environment. The toxic risk assessment of MOFs is necessary to achieve their sustainable applications. Reproducible and accurate measurement in toxicity assays is the first step in the risk evaluation of MOFs. However, a broad range of artifacts may occur in previous toxicity tests of MOFs due to diverse interferences. Therefore, control experiments are needed to discriminate such interferences and to revise the experimental protocol for the reduction and elimination of the artifacts. Herein, we present a review of the artifacts and control experiments in toxicity assays of MOFs in terms of MOF preparation, toxicity test, labeling and tracking, and co-exposure test. We also discuss the differences in the results of the toxicity test with and without a control experiment to illustrate the impact of the control experiment on the conclusion. We highlight the importance of a control experiment to reduce false negative or false positive results and to guarantee accurate toxicity data in the toxicity study of MOFs, which could advance the ecological risk assessment of MOFs as well as the safe-to-sustainable design of MOFs in tackling various challenges of future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.