ArticleMolecular oral microbiology2026
Defense Systems and Prophage Detection in Streptococcus mutans Strains.
Article in Molecular oral microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacteriophage-mediated biofilm control: a novel targeted strategy for the management of dental caries.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Postbiotics and phage synergy in precision oral microbiome engineering: systems biology strategies targetingFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- CRISPR spacer profiling and prophage mining reveal diverse bacteriophages associated withJournal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Acquired CRISPR spacers and rhamnose-glucose polysaccharide defects confer resistance toMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025Article
- Insight into crRNA Processing inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the species is extensively studied, limited data are available on antiphage defense systems (APDSs) in Streptococcus mutans. The present study aimed to explore the diversity and the occurrence of APDSs and to search for prophages in the genomes of clinical isolates of S. mutans using bioinformatics tools. Forty-four clinical isolates of S. mutans were obtained from saliva samples of people with Parkinson's disease. Genomic DNA was extracted, sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology, and analyzed for the presence of defense systems using DefenseFinder and PADLOC. CRISPR-Cas systems were characterized using CRISPRCasFinder, and prophages were detected by the PhiSpy pipeline from RAST. AcrFinder and AcrHub were used to identify anti-CRISPR proteins. Each strain harbored between 6 and 12 APDS, with restriction-modification systems being the most prevalent, followed by the MazEF toxin-antitoxin system and CRISPR-Cas systems. Type II-C CRISPR-Cas systems were not identified here in S. mutans. Novel variations in type II-A signature protein Cas9 were identified, allowing their classification into four distinct groups. Variability in direct repeat sequences within the same CRISPR array was also observed, and 80% of the spacers were classified as targeting "dark matter". A unique prophage, phi_37bPJ2, was detected, showing high similarity with previously described phages. The AcrIIA5 protein encoded by phi_37bPJ2 was conserved and suggested to remain functionally active. This study reveals the diversity of APDSs in S. mutans and the limited presence of prophages. The findings provide a foundation for future research on the evolutionary dynamics of these systems and their role in S. mutans adaptation to phage pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.