ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026
Validation of a Clinical and Polygenic Risk Prediction Model for Ovarian Cancer in the Nurses' Health Study.
Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- World Ovarian Cancer Day: unravelling the molecular anatomy of a silent killer.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecologic cancers because of its late diagnosis, but risk stratification for targeted prevention can improve outcomes. To identify women at risk of ovarian cancer, pathogenic variant testing is used, especially for those with a family history of the disease. However, high-risk genetic variants are rare, accounting for <20% of ovarian cancer cases overall. More recently, clinical models that help identify ovarian cancer cases incorporate polygenic risk for improved risk stratification. Herein, we cross-validate a polygenic risk-integrated clinical model called the refined risk model in a nested case-control population from the Nurses' Health Study. The refined risk model is compared with a clinical risk score and polygenic risk score model, respectively. The ORs per SD were 1.26 (1.01, 1.48), 1.13 (0.96, 1.33), and 1.22 (1.04, 1.43) with corresponding AUCs of 0.56 (0.51, 0.61), 0.54 (0.49, 0.59), and 0.55 (0.50, 0.60) for the refined risk, clinical risk, and polygenic risk models, respectively. Population screening has been assessed over the years, and although stage-shifting in the screened population has occurred, the mortality benefit was not evident. However, as treatments for ovarian cancer improve, the benefits of a risk-stratified approach to screening are expected to grow. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: In this study, we have validated the predictive performance of a combined clinical and polygenic model for ovarian cancer. Accurate risk assessment enables more efficient allocation of preventive interventions, including intensified surveillance and consideration of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at elevated risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.