Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41215703›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026

Validation of a Clinical and Polygenic Risk Prediction Model for Ovarian Cancer in the Nurses' Health Study.

Krishna Patel, Gillian S Dite, Erika L Spaeth, Bernard A Rosner

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krishna PatelChanning Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0005-9246-3751
Gillian S DiteRhythm Biosciences Ltd, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2448-2548
Erika L SpaethRhythm Biosciences Ltd, Bio21 Institute, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5397-3493
Bernard A RosnerChanning Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-0056

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
Life Course Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in WomenU01CA176726 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2018 to 2025
$22.4M
Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health StudyUM1CA186107 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, STAMPFER, MEIR · 2014 to 2023
$22.3M
Premonopausal Hormone Levels and Risk of Breast CancerR01CA067262 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HANKINSON, SUSAN E · 2002 to 2011
$11.9M
BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN THE NURSES'HEALTH STUDY COHORTR01CA049449 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HANKINSON, SUSAN E · 1989 to 2008
$11.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969NCI NIH HHS R01 CA049449NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067262NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176726NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecologic cancers because of its late diagnosis, but risk stratification for targeted prevention can improve outcomes. To identify women at risk of ovarian cancer, pathogenic variant testing is used, especially for those with a family history of the disease. However, high-risk genetic variants are rare, accounting for <20% of ovarian cancer cases overall. More recently, clinical models that help identify ovarian cancer cases incorporate polygenic risk for improved risk stratification. Herein, we cross-validate a polygenic risk-integrated clinical model called the refined risk model in a nested case-control population from the Nurses' Health Study. The refined risk model is compared with a clinical risk score and polygenic risk score model, respectively. The ORs per SD were 1.26 (1.01, 1.48), 1.13 (0.96, 1.33), and 1.22 (1.04, 1.43) with corresponding AUCs of 0.56 (0.51, 0.61), 0.54 (0.49, 0.59), and 0.55 (0.50, 0.60) for the refined risk, clinical risk, and polygenic risk models, respectively. Population screening has been assessed over the years, and although stage-shifting in the screened population has occurred, the mortality benefit was not evident. However, as treatments for ovarian cancer improve, the benefits of a risk-stratified approach to screening are expected to grow. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: In this study, we have validated the predictive performance of a combined clinical and polygenic model for ovarian cancer. Accurate risk assessment enables more efficient allocation of preventive interventions, including intensified surveillance and consideration of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at elevated risk.

Indexed as

Multifactorial InheritanceOvarian NeoplasmsAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedNursesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41215703
PMCPMC12877746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.