ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
'I want to be generous, but I only have limited energy': a qualitative study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients' preferences for clinical trials participation.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveResearch and decisions on health-related issues such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) continue to evolve as the etiology of network degenerative disease remains indeterminate. Due to its heterogeneity, clinical trials (CTs) are continually being conducted for beneficial breakthroughs aimed at improving the lives of patients with ALS. However, there is a dearth of research on ALS patients' health-seeking decisions and preferences in CTs, particularly for patients living in rural areas. To bridge this important gap, we explored patients' subjective experiences and preferences in CT participation through their emotions. MATERIALS AND
methodsSeventeen participants (10 ALS patients, 6 healthcare professionals, and an advocacy group representative associated with ALS) affiliated with the University of Iowa ALS Multidisciplinary clinic were purposively selected and interviewed for the study. Qualitative descriptive data were analyzed using thematic content analysis to understand the patients' experiences and preferences.
resultsFindings indicate key emotional and logistical challenges including fatigue, travel distance and constraints, limited trial availability, which are exacerbated by the disease's rapid progression and restrictive eligibility criteria. Participants' narratives highlighted frustration, anxiety, and fear as central emotional experiences influencing their health-seeking decisions. Conversely, expressions of hope and empathy emerged as significant motivators, with patients demonstrating a willingness to participate in CTs despite the known risk of limited personal benefits, while focusing on the need to benefit future ALS research. Patients prefer and desire more compensation, broader eligibility and inclusive criteria, trial availability and publicity, and access to telemedicine.
conclusionGiven the multifaceted physical, and emotional challenges faced by ALS patients, this study recommends prioritizing patient preferences in future CTs and intervention designs, while advocating for targeted grants and sustained funding that supports ALS clinical trials. This will better align with the needs and expectations of ALS patients, thereby enhancing trial participation and overall patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.