ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Mitonuclear Discordance of Beetles Shaped by Incomplete Lineage Sorting and Introgression Under Loose Interaction Mechanism.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Genome Comparison and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Family Carabidae (Coleoptera: Adephaga).Biology · 2026Article
- Disruption of mitonuclear coadaptation and compensatory evolution after an extreme dietary shift in carnivorous butterflies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative mitochondrial genome architecture and nuclear mitochondrial DNA (NUMT) landscapes in stink bugs of the family Pentatomidae.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Dissecting discordance of mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenetic trees in insects.Crop health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metazoan oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes are composed of subunits encoded by mitochondrial and nuclear genes, requiring continuous mitonuclear coevolution to ensure functional compatibility. However, mitochondrial and nuclear genomes exhibit separate inheritance patterns, leading to their distinct or even conflicting evolutionary histories. This study aimed to analyse phylogenetic signals among mitochondrial genes, nuclear-encoded OXPHOS genes, and general nuclear genes across 53 beetle species. Two major cases of mitonuclear discordance were detected. The nuclear-encoded OXPHOS genes supported mitochondrial phylogenetic signals in noterids, indicating that in noterids the evolutionary history of OXPHOS complexes diverged from the phylogenetic history. Conversely, nuclear-encoded OXPHOS genes aligned with the phylogenetic history of rhysodines, and this mitonuclear discordance suggests that mitochondrial genomes exhibited clear signatures of genetic introgression. By integrating phylogenetic reconstructions and reticulate evolutionary network analyses, we attributed the mitonuclear discordance in noterids to incomplete lineage sorting. In contrast, the mitochondrial genomes of rhysodines underwent introgressive hybridization events. Although mitonuclear incompatibility is typically resolved by nuclear compensatory mechanisms, our findings indicate that nuclear compensation exhibits limited efficacy at the gene level, yet locally adaptive residues persist. This was further supported by the weak correlation between nuclear-encoded OXPHOS genes and mitochondrial genes, with no robust mitonuclear coevolutionary signals detected. These findings collectively suggest a loose mitonuclear interaction in beetles. The decoupling of mitochondrial and nuclear evolutionary trajectories may serve as an evolutionary "buffer" to accommodate genomic conflicts while maintaining essential OXPHOS systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.