ArticleJournal of patient safety2026
Analysis of Patient Safety Event Report to Understand the Contribution of Health IT to Diagnostic Error.
Article in Journal of patient safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and Multidimensional Verification of Clinical Practice Standards for Physical Restraint: A Four-Year Retrospective Quality Improvement Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic errors are one of the most common and costly medical errors. Most diagnostic errors are due to provider cognitive processes and biases. With the widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), and other health information technology (health IT), EHRs are now the central repository for clinical information and its design and use affect the diagnostic process and diagnostic errors. The goal of this study was to analyze patient safety event reports to determine health IT contributions to diagnostic errors. Understanding how the health IT contributes to diagnostic error will help direct improvement efforts.
methodsFrom a data set consisting of 1,110,029 reports entered between 2015 and 2021, from 195 unique health care organizations across the United States, 2618 likely diagnostic error reports were retrieved. A sample of these reports were reviewed and those that were diagnostic related were coded by subject matter experts for whether the diagnostic error was preventable, the stage of the diagnostic process in which the error occurred, the type of error, how much health IT contributed to the error, what health IT system was responsible for the error, whether health IT was directly or indirectly responsible for the error, the type of health IT issue, whether copy and paste was mentioned and contributed to the error, whether the health IT contribution was preventable, the outcome of the error, and the severity of the error.
resultsThere were 2618 reports with a general event type category that suggested a diagnostic error. Of these, 119 reports explicitly mentioned health IT and were found to have strong or moderate evidence of health IT contributing to the error. From the remaining 2499 reports, 250 were randomly sampled and 93 (37.2% of 250) had strong or moderate evidence of a health IT contribution. Further analysis of these 212 reports showed EHRs were the most commonly described type of health IT associated with diagnostic errors (58.5%) and most diagnostic errors occurred in the test phase of the diagnostic process (74.5%). Most reports that had health IT as a contributor to the diagnostic error were associated with patient harm (74.5%). There was a trend towards a higher degree of harm when the errors were health IT-related compared with when there was little evidence of health IT contribution.
conclusionsHealth IT, and specifically the EHR, is a contributor to diagnostic errors. To address these issues, improved reporting taxonomies and improvements in health IT system design are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.