Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41215546›Full record

Observational studyKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2026

Trends in Widefield Fundus Photography and Optical Coherence Tomography Examination in South Korea (2015-2024).

Woosung Jeon, Min Seok Kim

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Woosung JeonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Min Seok KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital SNUBH-02-2024-0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand the nationwide utilization trends of widefield fundus photography (WFP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in South Korea from 2015 to 2024.

methodsThis retrospective observational study analyzed national insurance claims data from the Health and Medical Big Data Open System. Data for WFP and OCT were retrieved using their procedure code. We examined the annual number of patients and total examinations, stratified by age, sex, and healthcare facility type. Medical expenses were also analyzed.

resultsBetween 2015 and 2024, the number of patients undergoing WFP and OCT increased 11.5-fold (from 334,034 to 3,842,168) and 4.8-fold (from 682,893 to 3,256,514), respectively. Examination volumes grew even more sharply, with a 14.1- fold increase (from 907,009 to 12,796,731) for WFP and 5.9-fold (from 1,821,858 to 10,820,336) for OCT. Women consistently had higher utilization rates than men. Patients aged 50 to 79 years accounted for the majority of both WFP (>60%) and OCT (>70%) procedures, with the 70 to 79 age group showing the highest usage. Medical costs rose 17.6-fold for WFP and 7.4-fold for OCT. The proportion of procedures conducted in primary care settings also rose significantly, from 45.2% to 65.9% for WFP and from 43.4% to 57.9% for OCT.

conclusionsThe use of WFP and OCT in South Korea has markedly increased over the past decade, especially among older adults and in primary care settings. This trend reflects aging demographics, improved access, and policy changes, highlighting the need for efficient resource planning.

Indexed as

PhotographyRetinal DiseasesTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultKoreaOptical coherence tomographyWidefield fundus photography

Identifiers

PMID41215546
PMCPMC12901984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.