Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41215465›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

The optimization of crop response to climatic stress through modulation of plant stress response mechanisms. Opportunities for biostimulants and plant hormones to meet climate challenges.

Jing Li, Giulia Forghieri, Danny Geelen, Patrick du Jardin, Patrick H Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Special Issue: "Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Belgian endive-derived biostimulant activity inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing Li *HortiCell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1517-0291
Giulia Forghieri *CatMat Lab, Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca' Foscari University of Venice and Consortium INSTM UdR VE, via Torino 155, Venice, 30172, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9900-1822
Danny GeelenHortiCell, Department Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8105-3937
Patrick du JardinPlant Biology Laboratory, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, Gembloux, 5030, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-6951
Patrick H BrownDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, 95616, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-8608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the use of agronomic management practices to enhance crop stress resilience to climate stress through the modulation of natural plant growth regulatory pathways. The use of biostimulants or plant hormones to improve crop resilience is subject to strict regulatory oversight if changes in the regulation of plant growth are implied. Climate change is a major threat to crop potential and is characterized by both long-term shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns as well as increased occurrence of extreme weather events, posing an immediate threat to agriculture. Breeding and exogenous inputs have been used to enhance cropping system resilience, although these management practices are either too slow or constrained by cost and availability, to address rapidly emerging climate challenges. Exogenous biostimulants, microbials and plant hormones have shown great promise as novel mechanisms to optimize natural plant resilience, resulting in immediate but non-permanent improvements in plant responses to climate-induced stresses, representing a powerful but underexplored approach to enhance crop productivity under climate stress. The use of these exogenous inputs is, however, constrained by outdated and scientifically unsound regulations that consider any such modification as pesticidal in nature. The failure to modernize regulatory frameworks for the use of biostimulants in agriculture will constrain the development of safe effective tools and deprive growers of means to respond to climate change. Here, we discuss the scientific rationale for eliminating the regulatory barriers governing biostimulants or products that modulate plant regulatory networks and propose a framework for enabling legislation to strengthen cropping system resilience.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalPlant Growth RegulatorsStress, PhysiologicalPlant Growth Regulatorsabiotic stressbiostimulantclimate changeplant hormonestress tolerance

Identifiers

PMID41215465
PMCPMC12676087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.