ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025
Identification of Quality Indicators Used to Monitor, Evaluate and Improve Rural and Remote Care for Older People: A Scoping Review.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Quality Indicators Used to Monitor, Evaluate and Improve Rural and Remote Care for Older People: A Scoping Review.The Australian journal of rural health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveQuality indicators (QIs) specific to older adults receiving health care in rural and remote settings can be used to monitor healthcare quality, inform service improvements, and outcomes for these populations. This scoping review aimed to identify population-based QIs used to evaluate healthcare quality received by older people in rural and remote settings.
methodsTwo academic databases and grey literature sources were searched to identify population-based rural QI monitoring programs or rural QIs, routinely used and reported since 2012. QI program and specific characteristics, including country of origin, dimension of care quality captured, domain represented, QI type, data sources used, reporting strategies, and care settings were summarised.
findingsNine QI programs from seven countries with 52 QIs were identified. The QIs measured quality-of-service delivery (n = 28, 54%), accessibility (n = 11, 21%), resources (n = 9, 17%), and hospital readmissions (n = 4, 8%). Most QIs were outcome (n = 25, 48%) or process (n = 19, 37%) indicators, considering the dimension of safe healthcare. Three QIs (6%) measured rural hospital readmission in older people residing in rural areas.
conclusionsThree QIs measuring the proportion of older adults with unplanned rural hospital readmission were identified that could facilitate consistent reporting and benchmarking of care provided to older adults residing in rural and remote communities. Given the known disparities in equitable access and quality of healthcare for older people residing in rural and remote areas, these findings highlight the need for QIs across all quality dimensions to monitor healthcare quality and drive improvements in access and quality of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.