ArticleInjury epidemiology2025
Predicting neighborhood-level violence from features of the physical and social environment with machine learning.
Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundViolence is a leading cause of death and disparity in the United States. Individuals' physical and social environments can prevent or foster violence, but these complex milieus are challenging to model. In this study, we used machine learning to identify features of the local environment that are most predictive of violence in two Midwestern cities struggling with disinvestment and crime.
methodsThis was a serial cross-sectional study of census tracts in Cleveland, Ohio and Detroit, Michigan, 2011-2019. We took a machine learning approach-extreme gradient boosting-that enabled us to model 55 neighborhood features simultaneously and without making assumptions about their relationships or functional form. These features included building quality and type, public goods and services, residential stability, socioeconomic features, historical features, and demographic features. Primary outcomes were police-reported counts per square mile of violent crime and violent crime involving a firearm in Cleveland. Secondary outcomes were homicide and firearm homicide in Cleveland and Detroit. Variable importance was assessed with Shapley values.
resultsThe primary models performed well, with a correlation between observed and predicted counts of 0.89 for violent crime and 0.65 for firearm-involved violent crime. For both outcomes, the variables with the highest importance tended to be in the domains of building quality and type or socioeconomic features. Several variables had high importance for both outcomes, including multifamily homes per square mile, road network density, commercial buildings per square mile, and percentage of the population that was white.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the fundamental importance of place in preventing and generating violence. Future studies should explore modifiable, highly important variables as potential points of intervention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.