ArticleTrials2025
Bayesian enrollment modeling for several emergency medicine clinical trials.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02407028 (Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment (HOBIT) Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccrual of participants into clinical trials is a fundamental and important aspect for the management of trial progress. Monitoring of trial accrual often provides insight into the potential timing of key study events, such as interim analysis, as well as the feasibility of the overall trial to enroll the projected sample size in the original estimated timeline.
methodsA Bayesian first order simple dynamic linear model with weakly informative priors is utilized to characterize enrollment rates temporally within pre-defined time windows (quarterly) for the duration of a trial.
resultsApplication of the model to three ongoing clinical trials demonstrates the utility of the model to characterize the observed accrual patterns. Additionally, the applications demonstrate the flexibility of the model to react to variable accrual patterns without overreacting to the variability of accrual within a trial due to expected causes, such as seasonal variability in disease incidence, or unexpected causes, such as a global pandemic.
conclusionsMuch statistical literature has been dedicated to predicting when key study events are likely to occur by utilizing current estimated rates of participant accrual; however, study teams, sponsors, and funding agencies have interest in the previous trends in participant accrual. This work presents an addition to the literature which allows parties interested in assessing trial progress to do so by providing a flexible framework for the standardized characterization of trial accrual which is not overly sensitive to the expected variability of trial accrual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.