ReviewDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Diabetic cardiomyopathy: a comprehensive review of diagnosis, management, and future directions.
Review in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoring autophagy-apoptosis balance in diabetic cardiomyopathy via a biomimetic, ROS-responsive nanocarrier associated with Mst1 pathway modulation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Comprehending Endothelial Dysfunction and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Review
- Lipotoxicity in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Molecular Basis and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advanced glycation end products and RAGE signaling in diabetic cardiomyopathy: distinct mechanisms, human evidence, and translational barriers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in the application of nanoparticles for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Transcriptional regulatory network analysis uncovers modular gene control and potential key regulators in diabetic cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a growing challenge to global public health. The clinical characteristics are mainly fibrosis, hypertrophy, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac remodelling, and finally, heart failure. This alarming condition is often difficult to diagnose. Routine tests such as echocardiogram, electrocardiogram, and magnetic resonance imaging, along with specialized techniques such as transmitral Doppler, tissue Doppler imaging, and positron emission tomography, help diagnose and offer clearer insight into the condition. Current treatment strategies mainly address this medical condition as a condition secondary to diabetes. The main therapeutic practices involve glucose-lowering drugs such as glucagon-like peptide-1 modulators and sodium‒glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, along with other conventional lines of treatment to manage complications. Promising new potential therapeutic methods include gene therapy and noncoding RNA-mediated regulation of disarrayed signalling cascades. In this review, we address the benefits and limitations of the current system in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy as well as the possibilities and advantages of novel techniques. In addition to discussing biomarkers for screening, diagnosis, and drug response for diabetic cardiomyopathy, we also discuss management and prevention strategies, adversities, and quality of life, and provide a brief outlook for research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.