Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214765›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

Mosquito survival from mark-recapture studies releasing at known age.

Justin Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Justin MatthewsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. jnm212@ex.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe expected lifetime (EL) of mosquitoes has been the subject of a large body of historical research, including by mark-recapture (MR) methods. Previous researchers have presented collections of information informally, and the results of a large systematic search are available; however, a formal synthesis of information has not been carried out.

methodsMosquito studies were systematically selected and re-analysed, and the information pooled to characterise an age-dependent survival model. MR data were obtained from the subset of historical studies in which mosquitoes were released at known ages after emergence. Data were excluded if experiments held characteristics, established by simulation, in which age-dependent estimation would perform poorly. Analysis used the Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) model with age-dependent (Weibull) survival and time-independent capture probabilities.

resultsShape parameter estimates in many studies showed evidence of increasing mortality with age (senescence,

conclusionsThe study synthesised EL for females overall and for three important mosquito genera, taking account of mosquito age, and systematically restricting to studies with the most acceptable characteristics. The estimated quantities for Aedes and Anopheles require further caution because the number of datasets, after exclusions, is small. A number of studies were excluded on the grounds of uncertain reliability when analysed independently, and it is suggested that a future integrated (Bayesian) analysis could offer an important advantage by utilising such studies, which include older release cohorts. Increased study availability could allow further adjustment for study characteristics, notably spatial configuration.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMosquito VectorsAedesAge FactorsAnimalsAnophelesFemaleLongevityMark–recaptureMosquitoSenescenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID41214765
PMCPMC12604168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.