ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Authentic assessment meets sustainable development: Bringing meaning to undergraduate Physiology education.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Authentic assessment meets sustainable development: Bringing meaning to undergraduate Physiology education.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable development is a growing global concern, but university students in scientific fields such as Physiology struggle to see its direct relevance to their studies. This research explores how an authentic assessment can integrate the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs) into Physiology education. Students were tasked to design and present a group poster on the connections between an SDG and Physiology. Through a mixed-methods approach utilizing questionnaires, pre- and post-assignment data were collected and the students' perceptions of the links and learning opportunities explored. Students reported a shift in how they perceived the intersection between Physiology and societal issues, with many expressing a newfound passion for sustainability. Awareness and understanding of the SDGs increased significantly (19% and 36%, respectively). Students made connections between Physiology and goals such as No Poverty (SDG1), Quality Education (SDG4), Gender Equality (SDG5), and Climate Action (SDG13). Thirteen of the 17 SDGs were rated as significantly more relevant to Physiology after the assignment, among these, several less obviously related goals like Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG7), Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG11), Responsible Consumption and Production (SDG12), and Partnership for the Goals (SDG17). The remaining four (SDGs 2, 3, 6 and 15) had high initial relevance ratings, which did not significantly change, serving as an internal control supporting the validity of the observed increases for other goals. Responses to open questions suggested that the students' experience of the assessment was rich in context and meaning, making Physiology more than 'just being a uni topic'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.