ArticleTrials2025
Implementing oral (event-driven and daily) and long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis in mobile men in sub-Saharan Africa: a phase 3b, open-label, hybrid type 2 implementation and effectiveness trial (MOBILE MEN).
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06133686 (Implementing Oral), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing Oral (Event-driven and Daily) and Long-acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Mobile Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Phase 3b, Open-label, Hybrid Type 2 Implementation and Effectiveness Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rapid diagnostic tests, laboratory-based immunoassay and nucleic acid testing strategies for long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Defining HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Persistence: A Scoping Review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMen who are mobile for work are a key population at high risk of acquiring HIV. Flexible pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options, including event-driven (ED) oral PrEP and long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA), may offer increased access and acceptability for these men. However, limited data exist on the effectiveness and implementation of CAB-LA and ED PrEP among mobile men in Africa. Our study aims to assess the effectiveness and implementation of CAB-LA and oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (both daily and ED) through comparison of uptake, retention in care, coital coverage, and participant choice.
methodsWe will conduct a mixed0method, phase 3b, open-label, hybrid type 2 implementation and effectiveness randomised controlled trial (RCT). The trial will be carried out in 400 HIV-negative men aged 18 years or older in South Africa and Uganda. Men will be randomised 1:1 to either Group A: oral TDF/FTC PrEP (ED or daily) or Group B: CAB-LA over 9 months. After 9 months, participants from both groups will be offered a choice of PrEP (oral TDF/FTC or CAB-LA) for a further 9 months, with the ability to change their choice as required. Various strategies to support PrEP adoption, initiation, and persistence will be implemented, monitored, and reported on using a RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) implementation science framework. DISCUSSION: This study will provide critical data to inform scalable delivery models for both oral and injectable PrEP among mobile men at high risk for HIV acquisition. Findings will also highlight the potential of PrEP choice delivery and its benefits, offering evidence for governments to consider in the rollout of injectable PrEP in public health systems. Trial registration NCT06133686. Registered on 14 November 2023. PACTR202409632006463. Registered on 2 September 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.