Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214693›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2025

Revisiting HPV vaccination post-COVID: geopolitical, sociocultural, and ethical disparities in global health.

Sondos Al Sad, Labiqah Iftikhar, Masa Chamout

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sondos Al SadFamily and Community Medicine Department, Women's Health Primary Care Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 2356 Sutter St., San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA. alsad.sondos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0512-6924
Labiqah IftikharSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Masa ChamoutFaculty of Science, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHPV vaccines have been revolutionary in preventing HPV-related cervical cancer and reshaping the cervical cancer screening guidelines in the past decades. Yet, challenges persist in achieving universal accessibility and utilization. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, shifts have emerged in HPV vaccine research, implementation strategies, and the determinants shaping uptake and delivery, particularly from a global equity perspective.

methodsThis is a scoping review examining English-language, peer-reviewed articles published following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic until the end of 2024. It focuses on the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and factors influencing its uptake. Articles were retrieved from PubMed and Embase databases and screened for relevance using predefined search terms.

resultsOut of 2755 articles, 349 were included. We identified that most peer-reviewed articles focus on interventions and implementation strategies more than acknowledging geopolitical affairs, gender specificity, religious and ethical dimensions, medical mistrust, or healthcare discrimination. Most of the articles were cross-sectional in nature and most were funded by the National Cancer Institute. Interestingly, we found no peer-reviewed articles on the intersectionality of Judaism and HPV vaccine uptake, with a limited number on Islamic, Christian, or other religious intersectionality. Articles addressing how low- and middle-income countries could be equipped to develop and manage their own vaccine programs and manufacturing were largely absent; instead, cost-effectiveness research focused primarily on the vaccine’s ability to reduce disease burden.

conclusionPost-pandemic research on HPV vaccination indicates that levels of hesitancy and uptake have remained relatively stable. However, the literature highlights persistent inconsistencies in how the vaccine is prioritized across communities, healthcare professionals, and health systems. Messaging regarding its importance for cancer prevention remains fragmented, while cost barriers and the absence of the vaccine from many national immunization schedules continue to limit access. Notably, ethical, religious, and cultural considerations receive limited attention in current research, despite the pandemic underscoring the global significance of these factors in shaping health behaviors. These findings suggest a need to re-examine how HPV vaccination is framed and advanced as a public health priority within diverse sociocultural and systemic contexts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Global HealthHealthcare DisparitiesPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinationFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansSARS-CoV-2Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancerHealthcare discriminationHealth equityIndigenous healthReligiosity

Identifiers

PMID41214693
PMCPMC12604161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.