ArticleBMC nursing2025
The current nursing care of patients diagnosed with dual diagnosis: a comprehensive literature review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Nursing Students' Attitudes and Career Interests in Mental Health Nursing - An Integrative Review.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing care of patients diagnosed with dual diagnosis poses significant challenges such as limited resources, low levels of education, limited standardised treatment packages and guidelines. Understanding current approaches to providing nursing care for these group of patients is crucial, as it allows advancement in research towards improving patient outcomes and guidance for the nurses.
aimThis comprehensive literature review seeks to synthesise literature on the current nursing care of patients diagnosed with dual diagnosis.
methodThe comprehensive literature review follows the guidelines by Onwuegbuzie and Frels. The search for records was conducted in four databases including CINAHL, MedLine PsycINFO, and ScienceDirect. Additional grey literature was searched with the help of Google Scholar. Keywords used were dual diagnosis, co-occurring disorders, comorbid, nursing care, nursing. A total of 7 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review.
resultsThe evidence from the synthesis reveals a complex interplay between systemic processes, therapeutic relationships, and intervention outcomes, with both psychosocial and pharmacological modalities contributing to patient recovery. Five overarching themes were identified: structural deficiencies in care planning and documentation, therapeutic relationships as the basis of engagement, efficacy of psychosocial interventions such as psychoeducation and skill-building and individual counselling for behaviour change, role of pharmacological interventions within integrated care such as lurasidone for psychotic symptom and craving reduction and long-acting injectable aripiprazole for functional gains, barriers to sustained engagement such as impact of medication side effects and relapse and insufficient aftercare and trauma-informed practices.
conclusionNursing care of patients diagnosed with dual diagnosis is most effective when integrated, patient-centred, and combining psychosocial with pharmacological approaches. Therapeutic relationships, consumer engagement, and structured planning support recovery. However, documentation gaps, low participation, and poor aftercare remain barriers needing innovation, policy, and research. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.