ArticleBMC oral health2025
Risk factors of sinus perforation after extraction of upper third molars in proximity with the sinus floor.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSinus perforation (SP) is a relatively common complication during upper third molars (UTMs) extractions. However, previous studies included a broad range of UTM extractions, potentially underestimating the true incidence of SP by incorporating unrelated cases. This study investigated the risk factors for SP. during the extraction of UTMs that were closely adjacent to or protruded into the maxillary sinus.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at the General Dentistry and Fifth Division of Peking University School of Stomatology from January 2019 to May 2025. The study included partially or fully impacted UTMs, classified according to the extent of protrusion into the sinus, depth of impaction, and type of inclination. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and binary logistic regression, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 141 UTMs from 120 patients were included. SP occurred in 24 sites, yielding an SP rate of 16.5%. Of these, 7 perforations were iatrogenic, with all UTMs being mesially or horizontally impacted (p < 0.05). SP was not detected when less than half of the root tip protrude into the sinus. Most of the SP were repaired successfully with a modified trapezoid flap after reliable primary wound closure. Postoperative oral-antral fistula was detected in 1 case. Chi-square analysis revealed a significant correlation between the mesially inclined UTMs and the incidence of total and iatrogenic SP (p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression showed that meisal impaction (OR 4.12) and the type Ⅱc protrusion (OR 6.03) were significantly related to SP.
conclusionsFor the UTMs that closely related to sinus floor, mesially inclined UTMs was identified as the primary risk factor for intra-operative SP. Additionally, a modified trapezoid flap is recommended for optimal wound closure.
trial registrationThe research has been registered in the Chinese Medical Research Registration and Filing System with registration number MR-11-25-019459 on March 4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.