ArticleBMC oral health2025
Automatic recognition of oral health status in mixed dentition via intraoral photography.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren in the mixed dentition stage are susceptible to dental caries, necessitating frequent examination and preventive measures. In this study, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were used to develop a model for detecting oral health status in mixed dentition.
methodsIntraoral images of dentition spanning 2467 occlusal surfaces were collected from 7–9-year-old children for training and testing. The health status of all teeth, including caries, fillings, intraoral devices, pigments, and black stains, was tested. For the first permanent molar, indicator testing was conducted to determine the eruption conditions, fissure morphology, and sealing conditions. ResNet50 was trained for segmentation tasks, and TResNet was trained for detection tasks. The statistical analysis included calculations of the F1 score (F1) and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).
resultsThe model was able to correctly detect caries (F1, 0.777; AUC, 0.964), fillings (F1, 0.746; AUC, 0.893), pigmentation (F1, 0.836; AUC, 0.870), intraoral devices (F1, 0.800; AUC, 1.00) and black stains (F1, 0.867; AUC, 0.988). The model demonstrated good capabilities for detecting deep fissures (F1, 0.927; AUC, 0.951), completely erupted teeth (F1, 0.882; AUC, 0.944), and sealed teeth (F1, 0.947; AUC, 0.986), but it demonstrated a weak ability to detect incompletely erupted teeth (F1, 0.727; AUC, 0.871) and shallow fissures (F1, 0.632; AUC, 0.934).
conclusionsThe performance of the model was verified in detecting tooth status and screening teeth suitable for fissure sealants, but the scale of rare labels was also inadequate and requires optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.