ArticleBMC oral health2025
Reliability of clinical orthodontic indicators in the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess to the reliability of the orthodontic data for 6-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) as recorded in the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate (NRCLP).
methodsThis study included 64 children with UCLP, born between 2011 and 2015 and enrolled in the two Norwegian cleft centers. All participants had orthodontic recordings from the age of six in the NRCLP and corresponding dental model casts and radiographs available from the cleft centers. Data on dentoalveolar relations, assessed using GOSLON yardstick, the presence of supernumerary teeth and agenesis, and cephalometric values for intermaxillary sagittal relations recorded in the NRCLP were compared to reassessments conducted by four independent and blinded orthodontists. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement were evaluated using single measure intraclass correlation coefficients and Gwet's agreement coefficients.
resultsComparisons between reassessments and the NRCLP data showed substantial to almost perfect agreement for all orthodontic indicators. Intra-rater agreement for GOSLON was almost perfect. Inter-rater agreement among the four orthodontists was almost perfect for GOSLON scores and for assessment of supernumerary teeth and agenesis, and substantial for the intermaxillary sagittal relations.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that NRCLP in daily use since 2011, shows robust orthodontic indicators and reliable and trustworthy data for six-year-old children with UCLP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.