Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Evaluation of students' satisfaction with obe teaching modes in the manual therapy course by students' evaluation of educational quality questionnaire.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing cardiopulmonary physiotherapy education with an AI-driven Smart Learning Platform: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo design a teaching model of innovative theoretical and practical workshop for manual therapy (MT, also known as Tuina) course within Chinese higher medical education based on outcome-based education (OBE) concept, and to explore its implementation effect and application evaluation.
methodsSixty undergraduate students were randomly divided into three groups: lecture-based learning (LBL), blended teaching (LBL with online self-study), and OBE. The OBE group received student-centered modules combining theory and cognitive training. Effectiveness was assessed using the students’ evaluation of educational quality questionnaire (SEEQ) for dimensions like enthusiasm and interaction, as well as final course score.
resultsThe OBE group achieved significantly higher final score (87.15 ± 3.30, 95% CI: 85.61–88.70) than blended (84.70 ± 3.18, 95% CI: 83.21–86.19) and LBL groups (81.80 ± 4.60, 95% CI: 79.65–83.95). OBE also showed superior SEEQ ratings in group interaction, satisfaction, and breadth than the other teaching models, with lower learning burden compared to blended teaching.
conclusionsThe OBE-based MT course showed capacity in improving teaching satisfaction and effectiveness by integrating theory with practice, fostering cognitive engagement, and advancing innovative thoughts. OBE-trained students demonstrated relatively enhanced learning and thinking abilities, supporting their career development. The study highlighted the potential significance of OBE in cultivating the professional competence of traditional Chinese medicine students, thus may bridge traditional therapeutic wisdom with modern healthcare needs. However, large-scale and multi-center studies need to be conducted to further support the existing findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.