ArticleBMC public health2025
"Closing the gap in the wrong direction" migration, health policy, and the exclusion of asylum seekers, refugees and undocumented migrants from healthcare access in South Africa.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling population dynamics, health system, and unmet need toward health burden: scenarios in ASEAN and WHO SEARO countries.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Excluded Lives: Migrant Status and Access to Healthcare in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe right to health requires that healthcare systems be available, accessible, acceptable, and of good quality for all, regardless of legal or migration status. While South Africa's Constitution and international commitments uphold this right, recent policy developments-such as the 2023 National Health Insurance (NHI) Act and the 2024 White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration, and Refugee Protection-mark a shift toward institutionalised exclusion. Discriminatory practices that were once informal are increasingly codified in law, aligning healthcare policy with a broader securitisation agenda and undermining progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC).
methodsThis paper draws on a multi-method research design combining a structured policy review of South African, regional and global frameworks, with semi-structured interviews (n = 25) conducted with healthcare providers, civil society actors, and government stakeholders between 2022 and 2025. Data was analysed using thematic analysis to explore how formal policy and informal practice interact to produce exclusion.
resultsFindings reveal that legal and policy shifts are systematically narrowing healthcare access for asylum seekers, refugees, and undocumented migrants. Four intersecting themes emerged: (1) legal regression and policy securitisation; (2) policy by practice: informal exclusion and administrative discretion; (3) legal liminality and mental health and; (4) civil society as an unsustainable safety net. Despite constitutional protections, migrants are routinely denied care, misclassified, or subjected to unlawful fees. Mental health needs, in particular, remain severely neglected. The study highlights the limits of rights-based advocacy in a hostile policy environment and calls attention to the need for structural reform.
conclusionSouth Africa is not merely failing to meet its UHC goals-it is actively retreating from them. Exclusionary practices, once informal, are now guiding policy. Ensuring healthcare is truly accessible, acceptable, and sustainable for all requires urgent policy, legal, and institutional reforms to protect healthcare access for all, irrespective of status. Without these actions, the most vulnerable will continue to be excluded from essential services, undermining both constitutional values and global health goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.